13. A deep structure for biology

Our focus, as presented here in biological and ecological matters, is admittedly narrow. In the same way, Bjerknes saw a “deep structure” between meteorology and electromagnetism, and he used those observed correspondences to reform his subject. We are looking for a similar deep structure of biology with both the vector calculus and with Newtonian concepts of mass and inertia. We have just observed that a change in energy density is a change in structure and in configuration. It is a change in deep structure. This does not mean that we deny that biological organisms have any other features. It means only that we are looking for a different way of describing them. We are simply abstracting, from biological and ecological phenomena, those features that might allow the model we have in mind to be constructed. We do this with a view to isolating different features; running experiments; taking measurements; and then making predictions, all while using that observed deep structure.

Figure 13: Deep Structure: Some Examples of Isomorphism
 Deep Structure: Some Examples of Isomorphism

Group theory is the branch of mathematics specializing in deep structures. It draws objects together on the basis of operations held in common (Garling, 1986). A “one-to-one correspondence” exists between all members of the group, under the given operations. Thus even though the square, the cross-head screw, and the units of G, the Gaussian integer field, displayed in Figure 13 look like vastly different entities, they nevertheless hold certain properties in common. Those properties are the deep structure that then define the group.

In the specific case depicted in Figure 13, each of the three objects shares, for their deep structure, an ability to rotate through 90º, after which each is left essentially unchanged. In the first, we pick up a piece of square Origami paper and rotate it clockwise through 90º. In the second, we take a Phillips screwdriver and drive the screw inwards by a quarter turn. In the third we multiply by -i (and since i = √-1 this gives 1 → -i → -1 → i → 1). The Gaussian field of imaginary numbers is an enormously powerful tool that allows far-reaching conclusions about the other members of this group to be drawn, and which probably could not be drawn in any other way. Those conclusions can then be validated by experiment. As long as these operations are respected, all such conclusions will apply equally well to the others, no matter how diverse their other features. These three objects are therefore isomorphic … they have the same deep structure.

The immediate question is: are biological populations truly isomorphic with vector bodies that possess inertia and specified directions of action, and so that behave as a Newtonian mass? If so then all the equations and the powerful mathematical equipment pertaining to those vector fields of study, such as Green’s theorem and planimeters, will immediately become available to biology and ecology, which would surely be an overwhelming benefit.

Recent Posts

Walls, energy, and a Centre for Biology

Let us consider the following apparently definitive declaration made by the Centre for Mathematical Biology, Oxford University: “You can’t compare a living organism to a heat pump”. But … is this really true?

  Read more ...
The more they remain the same the more they change

John Ray, the English naturalist and scientist, produced the first ever biologically-relevant definition of ‘species’. He was trying to classify plants and in 1686 wrote: In order that an inventory of plants may be begun and a classification (divisio) of them correctly established, we must try to discover criteria of some sort for distinguishing what [...]

  Read more ...
Can we escape evolution?

Although the word ‘constraint’ often has a negative connotation in ordinary language, it is how scientists and mathematicians operate. One of the first and most effective uses of a scientific-mathematical constraint came in the seventeenth centruy from the Frenchman Pierre de Fermat (of ‘Fermat’s last theorem’ fame). Natural philosophers of his day wondered what path [...]

  Read more ...
Geography and the Gibbs energy

The ‘Gibbs energy’ is invariably difficult to explain to those who don’t know what it is. And despite its importance, it was only at the end of the nineteenth century that Max Rubner, the German physicist and physiologist, at last convinced other scientists that the energy that biological organisms use in metabolic processes exactly equals [...]

  Read more ...
Circumambulations: what are they, and why are they relevant to biology?

So what is a circumambulation, and why is it relevant to biology and evolution? Brian Charlesworth wrote in his book Evolution in age-structured populations (Cambridge University Press, 1994) that: “… the concept of generation time is a rather arbitrary one”. He then lists several alternatives. It is surely rather strange that something so fundamental to [...]

  Read more ...

Comments or queries

Please click here to go to the comments page if you wish to make a comment or raise a query regarding anything in this section. Your comement or query will appear here. If necessary, someone will also respond and answer as soon as possible. (In order to prevent ‘comment spam’, your first comment must be approved by a moderator. Once approved, your subsequent comments or queries will appear here immediately).

 

Recent tweets