43. The natural selection of Brassica rapa

Claims are all very well but it is a little different to see them in action. We therefore begin by discussing Brassica rapa’s biological potential as it is evidenced on the individual entities over its generation length, and which is its given display of Darwin’s natural selection.

When Brassica rapa first germinates, its average individual biological potential, µ̅—i.e. the way in which each B. rapa plant interacts with the environment and apportions its energies—emerges from its net stock of biological matter, U, at the average rate µ̅ = 3.276 x 10-5 watts, or joules per second over the population. At this germinating stage, the way B. rapa has its biological matter configured, it is allocating its Gibbs energy between its mechanical and its nonmechanical work such that its measured energy flux maintains = 0.00117 grams of components as an average over the population; whilst its chosen configuration of chemical bonds maintains an average individual energy of = 1.017 joules of chemical bonds.

Due to its continuing apportionments of energy, when Brassica rapa reaches its full leaf stage its individual energy flux has grown by a factor of 13 to µ̅ = 4.151 x 10-4 watts. But we can also conclude, from this biological potential we have discovered, and which is the measurable power of natural selection, that B. rapa has changed its behaviour and its apportionment ratios over the interval. The energy flux has not only increased, but the apportionment ratios have also changed. The net result is that each B. rapa plant can now (a) take on more mass more rapidly if necessary, but can also reverse this whether it be because of lack of resources in the environment or else to reproduce; and/or (b) take on more energy more rapidly and/or again reverse; and/or (c) simply reconfigure itself more or less rapidly by amending its ability to select amongst its available paths. This will change its configurations and its increases or decreases both in mass and energy density, and its overall energy throughput. B. rapa can distribute its biological activities amongst all available paths, and it did in fact switch amongst them over this measured interval between its germination and full leaf stages and in the various generations we grew to determine its age equilibrium distribution population. The relative rapidity and timing of such changes in biological potential must be—and can now be—recorded.

Brassica rapa has increased its biological potential and energy flux by a factor of 13 between the germination and full leaf stages, but it also increased its average individual mass by 43 times to approximately = 0.05 grams of biological matter. This is its mechanical chemical work over the period. However, over that same interval its energy content has increased by only 6.90 times to = 7.02 joules. This change in its nonmechanical chemical energy is only 16% of the apportionments made, over that same interval, to mass. We can therefore deduce that B. rapa has consistently repartitioned its power usage, over this period, so it expends most of its available wattage on mechanical chemical energy and on growth.

Biological potential is thus a way of recording the instantaneous changes a biological population can undertake as it changes its apportionings in mass, in energy, and also in the relativity of those apportionments … which must also use energy. All of this is now eminently measurable in an entity’s energy flux, which is a manifestation of its biological potential, µ. This is: the natural selection of paths. But we of course need to know how those apportionments changed in response to dn/dt, the changes in numbers.

Recent Posts

Walls, energy, and a Centre for Biology

Let us consider the following apparently definitive declaration made by the Centre for Mathematical Biology, Oxford University: “You can’t compare a living organism to a heat pump”. But … is this really true?

  Read more ...
The more they remain the same the more they change

John Ray, the English naturalist and scientist, produced the first ever biologically-relevant definition of ‘species’. He was trying to classify plants and in 1686 wrote: In order that an inventory of plants may be begun and a classification (divisio) of them correctly established, we must try to discover criteria of some sort for distinguishing what [...]

  Read more ...
Can we escape evolution?

Although the word ‘constraint’ often has a negative connotation in ordinary language, it is how scientists and mathematicians operate. One of the first and most effective uses of a scientific-mathematical constraint came in the seventeenth centruy from the Frenchman Pierre de Fermat (of ‘Fermat’s last theorem’ fame). Natural philosophers of his day wondered what path [...]

  Read more ...
Geography and the Gibbs energy

The ‘Gibbs energy’ is invariably difficult to explain to those who don’t know what it is. And despite its importance, it was only at the end of the nineteenth century that Max Rubner, the German physicist and physiologist, at last convinced other scientists that the energy that biological organisms use in metabolic processes exactly equals [...]

  Read more ...
Circumambulations: what are they, and why are they relevant to biology?

So what is a circumambulation, and why is it relevant to biology and evolution? Brian Charlesworth wrote in his book Evolution in age-structured populations (Cambridge University Press, 1994) that: “… the concept of generation time is a rather arbitrary one”. He then lists several alternatives. It is surely rather strange that something so fundamental to [...]

  Read more ...

Comments or queries

Please click here to go to the comments page if you wish to make a comment or raise a query regarding anything in this section. Your comement or query will appear here. If necessary, someone will also respond and answer as soon as possible. (In order to prevent ‘comment spam’, your first comment must be approved by a moderator. Once approved, your subsequent comments or queries will appear here immediately).

 

Recent tweets